Posts Tagged ‘OOP’
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 17th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 14th, 2009 at 5:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 8th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 7th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 3rd, 2009 at 9:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted April 26th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted April 18th, 2009 at 5:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted April 14th, 2009 at 5:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted April 11th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted April 6th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
Page 4 of 6« First...23456
Sponsors
Recent Posts
Categories
Tags
 
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
  • Partner links