Posts Tagged ‘OOP’
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted March 6th, 2010 at 8:51 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted February 28th, 2010 at 8:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted February 24th, 2010 at 12:52 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted February 21st, 2010 at 8:51 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted August 15th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted August 12th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted August 11th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted August 8th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted August 3rd, 2009 at 9:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted July 31st, 2009 at 9:49 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
Page 1 of 612345...Last »
Sponsors
Recent Posts
Categories
Tags
 
May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
  • Partner links