Posts Tagged ‘OOD’
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 28th, 2009 at 9:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 24th, 2009 at 5:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 23rd, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 16th, 2009 at 1:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 12th, 2009 at 1:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 7th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted June 4th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 31st, 2009 at 9:49 pm
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 28th, 2009 at 1:50 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
  • Using ‘Get’ And ‘Set’ Might Be Something You’ll Regret
    by Software Talk
    Posted May 27th, 2009 at 10:35 am
    It’s an all-too-common pitfall. Programmers who attempt to write object-oriented code decide to make all of their data variables private, while creating public get() and set() function pairs for each one. “See?” they declare, as they pat themselves on their backs. “The data is private, but it can be accessed through these functions. I’ve encapsulated my data. That’s what object-oriented design requires.”I think this betrays a fundamental (and exceedingly...
Page 3 of 612345...Last »
Sponsors
Recent Posts
Categories
Tags
 
February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
  • Partner links